Along with doubtlessly hurting Storm’s protection, Klein’s letter to the court docket recommended that Decide Failla’s ruling could have contravened one of many federal guidelines that govern legal proceedings. Primarily, Klein argued that the federal government can not legally compel the protection to reveal the names of its skilled witnesses until the protection has requested the identical data from the prosecution. Storm’s protection “deliberately made no such request,” Klein wrote, with a view to maintain their witness listing non-public.
Trending
- Simply Listed | 130 S Ocean Breeze
- HUD strikes to eradicate multifamily green-energy incentive
- Ethereum Reclaims $2,444 Stage – Bullish Continuation In Focus
- 2025 Excessive Beta Shares Listing | The 100 Highest Beta S&P 500 Shares
- Suno snaps up WavTool for its AI music modifying instruments amid ongoing dispute with music labels | TechCrunch
- Margin name error
- Shares to purchase for long run: Analysts suggest 6 largecap, 1 smallcap scrips; Avenue Supermarts, LIC on the checklist
- Main win by pro-rent freeze Mamdani knocks shares of Flagstar financial institution on NYC market publicity