Along with doubtlessly hurting Storm’s protection, Klein’s letter to the court docket recommended that Decide Failla’s ruling could have contravened one of many federal guidelines that govern legal proceedings. Primarily, Klein argued that the federal government can not legally compel the protection to reveal the names of its skilled witnesses until the protection has requested the identical data from the prosecution. Storm’s protection “deliberately made no such request,” Klein wrote, with a view to maintain their witness listing non-public.
Trending
- Jefferies provides Nvidia, 5 others to its ‘Franchise Picks’ highest-conviction shares
- One week left to spice up your model with a Facet Occasion at TC All Stage | TechCrunch
- Surging credit score report prices drawing consideration from FHFA’s Pulte
- Capital One Enterprise X Holders Are Shedding Beloved Lounge Entry Perks – NerdWallet
- Redfin Joins the Parade of Housing Bears—How Does Their Prediction Stack Up?
- Keller Williams Faucets Canva in Daring Transfer to Empower Brokers with World-Class Design Instruments – KW Outfront Journal
- Simply Listed | 11033 67th Place N
- Syrian inventory trade reopens after a 6-month hiatus as a part of U.S.-led push for a brand new free market economic system