Can Twitter Pictures Predict Worth Motion Throughout FED Bulletins?
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) conferences are referred to as the “Superbowl of Finance” on account of their vital influence on monetary markets. These conferences, the place essential choices about financial coverage are made, appeal to the eye of merchants and buyers worldwide. The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Belief (SPY) performac and fairness danger premia are carefully watched throughout occasions near the speed change announcement, as they will present insights into market sentiment and potential actions. Crypto has not too long ago change into mainstream and has additionally been accepted as a basic asset class. Market members in that area are additionally carefully watching the outcomes of press conferences and judging the power of the Fed’s Chair to fulfill the questions of curious reporters on future projections about financial progress and clarify anticipated choices.
Apparently, the intersection of social media and textual content evaluation coupled with picture evaluation supplies uncanny insights about financial coverage: current analysis has proven that sentiment evaluation of Twitter pictures can predict inventory efficiency throughout FOMC days significantly better than textual content alone. Analysis paper finds that, along with the elevated use of pictures round FOMC bulletins, the picture tone is considerably and negatively related to the implied FOMC danger premium and positively related to realized returns round FOMC announcement days for each fairness and Treasury bond markets. In the meantime, Twitter textual content tone will not be statistically vital with the implied FOMC danger premium or realized extra returns. These outcomes align with the established significance of public sentiment expressed on Twitter and the rising utilization of visible media for expressing opinions. The insignificant outcomes for textual content tone could be pushed by the problems of quantifying the textual content of tweets as a result of elevated substitution of pictures over textual content and points with correct quantification of tweet textual content on account of diversified points resembling emoticons, sarcasm, and slang.
This revolutionary method leverages pure language processing and picture evaluation to gauge market sentiment, providing a brand new instrument for buyers to contemplate. Are days of pure textual content parsing lengthy gone as they will not present dependable details about basic investor public sentiment? Whereas there isn’t a direct technique derived from this evaluation, the regression tables supplied within the analysis supply worthwhile insights which might be insightful for additional evaluation.
The paper’s introduction highlights the significance of understanding market sentiment and its predictive energy, particularly throughout essential monetary occasions like FOMC conferences. Part 3.3 delves deeper into the methodology and findings, making it a compelling learn for astute readers enthusiastic about social media and monetary market relationships.
Authors: Sakshi Jain, Alexander Kurov, Bingxin Li, and Jalaj Pathak
Title: Twitter Picture Tone and FOMC Bulletins
Hyperlink: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4937152
Summary:
We quantify the picture and textual content tone of tweets round FOMC bulletins and report proof on the rising use of visible content material. We discover that it’s the tone of pictures in tweets, fairly than the textual content, that’s considerably related to the implied FOMC danger premium and realized return within the fairness and bond markets round FOMC bulletins. One commonplace deviation enhance in picture tone corresponds to a six foundation level lower within the implied FOMC danger premium. These outcomes are consistent with the established significance of public sentiment expressed on Twitter; and with rising visible media utilization within the expression of opinions which function unconventional parts resembling emoticons, sarcasm, and slang. The influence of picture tone is strong for monetary market-related tweets, various measures of danger premium, textual content tone, subsets of tweets, and completely different time intervals round FOMC bulletins.
And as all the time, we current a number of fascinating figures and tables:
Notable quotations from the tutorial analysis paper:
“Particularly, we quantify the textual content and picture tone of tweets round FOMC bulletins and look at their corresponding influence on implied FOMC danger premiums and realized returns for each fairness and bond markets. We quantify the Twitter picture tone utilizing the CNN picture classification machine studying mannequin (Obaid and Pukthuanthong, 2022; Jiang et al., 2023). Whereas the Twitter textual content tone is calculated utilizing TweetNLP (Camacho-Collados et al., 2022). The implied FOMC danger premium used on this research is calculated in response to Liu et al. (2022) and is an options-based measure computed round FOMC bulletins that minimizes potential contamination brought on by different danger components.1 The research focuses on the interval from 2013 to 2019 as a result of availability of Twitter knowledge from 2013.2 The seven-year dataset encompasses quite a few vital coverage actions by the Federal Reserve, together with the continuation of quantitative easing, the federal funds fee liftoff, gradual fee hikes, and coverage reversals.
As supported by Azar and Lo (2016), Masciandaro et al. (2023) and Schmanski et al. (2023), Twitter is an effective proxy for the sentiment of most of the people which finally interprets to the sentiment of the market particularly across the main financial occasions such because the FOMC bulletins. Additional, with the reducing consideration spans, we consider the photographs are an vital technique of expressing and receiving info, at par with textual content, or presumably much more (Obaid and Pukthuanthong, 2022). We argue that pictures are extra carefully related to key info, whereas textual content tends to supply extra complete particulars. On Twitter, a put up might usually embody a single picture with an extra line of textual content. This means that Twitter customers use pictures to convey crucial message they need to share, whereas textual content serves to supply extra context or background info. This structural distinction highlights why pictures are sometimes extra pertinent to the principle level and why textual content supplies supplementary, and typically much less central, particulars. With these concerns, we hypothesize a unfavourable and vital relationship between Twitter tone and the Implied FOMC danger premium (Liu et al., 2022) and a optimistic relationship with realized returns (Cieslak et al., 2019) on account of Twitter tone being a proxy for market sentiment and therefore an elevated optimistic tone/decreased unfavourable tone implying an improved market notion and sentiment for each fairness and bond markets.
The unfavourable relationship of picture tone with the implied FOMC danger premium is consistent with the interpretation of the implied FOMC danger premium established by Liu et al. (2022). In line with their definition, the implied FOMC danger premium is negatively related to optimistic financial developments, and vice versa. It’s because during times of financial progress resembling will increase in GDP and consumption progress, the danger premiums are decrease on account of decrease perceived danger, whereas during times of financial downturns, the danger premiums are greater to compensate for greater perceived dangers. We additionally discover a optimistic and vital relationship between picture tone and S&P 500 index extra returns (Cieslak et al., 2019), in addition to the realized returns in bond markets (Adrian et al., 2013). Since danger premium displays the pessimism available in the market, a optimistic measure of public expression has a unfavourable affiliation with it. Nevertheless, the surplus returns in fairness and bond markets replicate the optimism available in the market and thus have a optimistic relationship with the general public expression on Twitter.In distinction to the unfavourable and vital relationship between tweet picture tone and the implied FOMC danger premium, the affiliation between tweet textual content tone and the implied FOMC danger premium will not be vital. […]
Determine 2 presents the implied FOMC danger premiums (IFRP) for the day of FOMC bulletins for the danger aversion coefficients of γ = 5, γ = 7.5 and γ = 10 resulting in α = −13, α = −20.5 and α = −28 respectively (Liu et al., 2022; Campbell and Thompson, 2007). The developments reveal pronounced fluctuations, with a notable peak in IFRP utilizing an α of -20.5 in each 2016 and 2018. IFRP values with α of -28 and -13 comply with an identical sample, displaying overlapping developments from 2016 to 2018.
Desk 6 presents the influence of Twitter pictures and textual content tone on the S&P 500 index extra returns. The surplus return is calculated by measuring returns that exceed the risk-free returns of the 30-day US Treasury payments (Cieslak et al., 2019; Lucca and Moench, 2015). Panel A presents the outcomes for the influence of the day t − 1 Twitter picture and textual content tone on the FOMC announcement day extra returns calculated for interval [0, +1] with respect to the FOMC announcement. Equally, panel B exhibits the outcomes for the associations between the Twitter picture and textual content tone calculated on the day previous to FOMC bulletins and the surplus return for the interval [−1, 0].”
Are you in search of extra methods to examine? Join our publication or go to our Weblog or Screener.
Do you need to be taught extra about Quantpedia Premium service? Verify how Quantpedia works, our mission and Premium pricing supply.
Do you need to be taught extra about Quantpedia Professional service? Verify its description, watch movies, assessment reporting capabilities and go to our pricing supply.
Are you in search of historic knowledge or backtesting platforms? Verify our checklist of Algo Buying and selling Reductions.
Or comply with us on:
Fb Group, Fb Web page, Twitter, Linkedin, Medium or Youtube
Share onLinkedInTwitterFacebookConsult with a good friend
